In recent weeks, we’ve witnessed major tech events: Google I/O highlighted the launch of the Gemini AI engine for smartphones, Microsoft Build focused on its Copilot+ for PCs, and Apple’s WWDC24 showcased AI features across its product lineup. Each company had a different approach and outcome.

Google’s Launch
Google executed a strong launch for its AI engine, emphasizing engaging features that resonated well with users. However, it primarily targeted smartphone users, leaving some of its PC audience feeling neglected.

Microsoft’s Challenges
Microsoft’s Build event was less successful, with significant issues surrounding its Copilot+ rollout. Key features were incompatible with existing hardware, leading to negative press, particularly around its “Recall” feature, which raised false privacy concerns. This overshadowed the event and detracted from the overall message.

Apple’s Comprehensive Rollout
In contrast, Apple effectively integrated its AI—dubbed “Apple Intelligence”—across its entire product line, from PCs to smartphones. This comprehensive approach created a more compelling and cohesive experience than either Google or Microsoft could offer.

The Value of Keynotes

A significant aspect of Apple’s success lies in its approach to event keynotes. While companies like Google and Microsoft focus on developer-centric formats, Apple treats its keynotes as extended product promotions aimed at the end-user. This strategy builds excitement and helps control the narrative around new announcements.

Apple’s emphasis on user experience during WWDC allows it to connect with consumers, even if the on-stage charisma of past leaders like Steve Jobs isn’t fully replicated today.

Microsoft’s AI Rollout Hurdles

Microsoft’s integration of ChatGPT faced criticism due to quality issues that hampered its performance. As a result, it ranked last in a recent AI assistant comparison. In contrast, Apple cleverly distanced itself from these problems by linking to ChatGPT as an optional feature rather than embedding it directly into its OS. This separation mitigated potential fallout from any associated quality concerns.

Additionally, while both Apple and Microsoft announced ambitious indexing apps, Microsoft’s “Recall” faced scrutiny over privacy issues, a problem Apple avoided by effectively communicating its privacy protections.

Coverage and Developer Access

Google’s AI is set to work on a broad range of Android devices, while Microsoft’s Copilot+ is initially limited to new Snapdragon X Elite laptops, effectively alienating existing users. Apple, however, rolled out its AI across its entire lineup, providing developers with tools they can use on smartphones, tablets, and PCs. This extensive coverage enhances the development experience compared to Google and Microsoft.

Event Performance Comparison

Historically, Apple has delivered strong launch events, often eclipsing competitors like Google and Microsoft. While Microsoft has occasionally shone—such as during the Windows 95 launch—Google has yet to match Apple’s event impact.

Apple’s production quality has notably improved, likely influenced by the resources and talent drawn from Apple TV. In contrast, Google and Microsoft have not leveraged their respective platforms to enhance their event presentations effectively.

Setting the Standard

Google I/O was a decent start, but it primarily catered to smartphone users, neglecting the PC market. Microsoft’s convoluted Copilot+ launch demonstrated a lack of learning from Google’s efforts, leading to poor positioning of its features.

Apple, on the other hand, seamlessly integrated AI into its offerings, presenting a unified vision that resonates with both developers and consumers. By tactically adjusting its messaging in response to Microsoft’s challenges, Apple maintained high presentation quality and strengthened customer loyalty.

Conclusion

Apple’s WWDC once again set the benchmark for how to effectively announce significant products and features. While Google and Microsoft have the capability to deliver similar quality, they haven’t prioritized this aspect enough to match Apple’s excellence. Ultimately, Apple’s strategic approach has positioned it as the leader in AI rollout among its competitors.